LISS Data Archive > On accountability of public agencies (automated vs non-automated decision-making)

Publisher
Centerdata
Creator
Madalina Busuioc (VU Amsterdam); Kristina Weißmüller (VU Amsterdam)
Created
Jul 17 2025
Description
A vignette questionnaire on accountability of public agencies (automated vs non-automated decision-making).
Panel
lissdata
Begin date
Mar 20 2023

There are no questions found for this study

Variable Dataset English Dutch
nomem_encr caj23a Number of the household member encrypted
caj23a_m caj23a Year and month of the field work period
caj23a001 caj23a Mobile layout
caj23a002 caj23a Random number - to which condition is the respondent assigned?
caj23a003 caj23a Permutation - Which statement was shown first?
caj23a004 caj23a Permutation - Which statement was shown second?
caj23a005 caj23a Permutation - Which statement was shown first?
caj23a006 caj23a Permutation - Which statement was shown second?
caj23a007 caj23a Permutation - Which statement was shown third?
caj23a008 caj23a Permutation - Which statement was shown first?
caj23a009 caj23a Permutation - Which statement was shown second?
caj23a010 caj23a Permutation - Which statement was shown first?
caj23a011 caj23a Permutation - Which statement was shown second?
caj23a012 caj23a Permutation - Which statement was shown third?
caj23a013 caj23a Permutation - Which statement was shown fourth?
caj23a014 caj23a Permutation - Which statement was shown first?
caj23a015 caj23a Permutation - Which statement was shown second?
caj23a016 caj23a Permutation - Which statement was shown first?
caj23a017 caj23a Permutation - Which statement was shown second?
caj23a018 caj23a Permutation - Which statement was shown third?
caj23a019 caj23a Permutation - Which statement was shown first?
caj23a020 caj23a Permutation - Which statement was shown second?
caj23a021 caj23a Permutation - Which statement was shown first?
caj23a022 caj23a Permutation - Which statement was shown second?
caj23a023 caj23a Permutation - Which statement was shown third?
caj23a024 caj23a Permutation - Which statement was shown fourth?
caj23a025 caj23a How much do you personally trust each of the following institutions? The Dutch national government.
caj23a026 caj23a How much do you personally trust each of the following institutions? Your local government.
caj23a027 caj23a How much do you personally trust each of the following institutions? The police.
caj23a028 caj23a How much do you personally trust each of the following institutions? The civil service.
caj23a029 caj23a Indicate whether you think it would be a good thing or a bad thing, if it were to happen: Increase in ethnic, religious, and cultural diversity in the Netherlands.
caj23a030 caj23a Indicate whether you think it would be a good thing or a bad thing, if it were to happen: Broader use of Artificial Intelligence technology.
caj23a031 caj23a Indicate whether you think it would be a good thing or a bad thing, if it were to happen: Greater reliance on nuclear power.
caj23a032 caj23a Indicate whether you think it would be a good thing or a bad thing, if it were to happen: More importance placed on remote work.
caj23a033 caj23a The police are responsible for the discriminatory outcome to a great extent.
caj23a034 caj23a The police are to blame for the discriminatory outcome to a great extent.
caj23a035 caj23a We asked you whether, in your opinion, the police are responsible for the outcome. In your own words, please briefly explain the reasons for your answer.
caj23a036 caj23a The police should be held accountable for the discriminatory outcome.
caj23a037 caj23a The police should face consequences for the discriminatory outcome.
caj23a038 caj23a We asked you whether, in your opinion, the police should face the consequences for the discriminatory outcome. In your own words, please briefly explain what type of consequences would be appropriate in this case?
caj23a039 caj23a We asked you whether, in your opinion, the police should face the consequences for the discriminatory outcome. In your own words, please briefly explain the reasons for your answer.
caj23a040 caj23a The police intended to discriminate against citizens with a migration background.
caj23a041 caj23a The analysts intended to discriminate against citizens with a migration background.
caj23a042 caj23a The algorithm intended to discriminate against citizens with a migration background.
caj23a043 caj23a The police had a high degree of influence over the discriminatory outcome.
caj23a044 caj23a In your opinion, what should the police have done differently to prevent the discriminatory outcome? (In your own words, in a few sentences.)
caj23a045 caj23a The police performed their duties properly.
caj23a046 caj23a The police acted in the interest of the citizens.
caj23a047 caj23a The police were honest.
caj23a048 caj23a The police can be trusted.
caj23a049 caj23a The report revealed that:
caj23a050 caj23a According to the report, the discrimination is attributed to:
caj23a051 caj23a Please explain what you think the discriminatory outcome could have resulted from.
caj23a052 caj23a Please select the correct answer:
caj23a053 caj23a You have indicated that [that the report did not specify / you do not recall] how the algorithm was developed. If you were asked to guess, which of the following options would be more likely?
caj23a054 caj23a The municipality is responsible for the discriminatory outcome to a great extent.
caj23a055 caj23a The municipality is to blame for the discriminatory outcome to a great extent.
caj23a056 caj23a We asked you whether in your assessment the municipality is responsible for the outcome. In your own words, please briefly explain the reasons for your answer.
caj23a057 caj23a The municipality should be held accountable for the discriminatory outcome.
caj23a058 caj23a The municipality should face consequences for the discriminatory outcome.
caj23a059 caj23a We asked you whether in your assessment the municipality should face the consequences for the outcome. In your own words, please briefly explain what types of consequences would be appropriate in this case?
caj23a060 caj23a We asked you whether in your assessment the municipality should face the consequences for the outcome. In your own words, please briefly explain the reasons for your answer.
caj23a061 caj23a The municipality intended to discriminate against citizens with migration background.
caj23a062 caj23a The analysts intended to discriminate against citizens with migration background.
caj23a063 caj23a The algorithm intended to discriminate against citizens with migration background.
caj23a064 caj23a The municipality had a high degree of influence over the discriminatory outcome.
caj23a065 caj23a In your opinion, what should the municipality have done differently to prevent the discriminatory outcome?
caj23a066 caj23a The municipality performed its duties properly.
caj23a067 caj23a The municipality acted in the interest of the citizens.
caj23a068 caj23a The municipality was honest.
caj23a069 caj23a The municipality can be trusted.
caj23a070 caj23a The report revealed that:
caj23a071 caj23a According to the report, the discrimination is attributed to:
caj23a072 caj23a What do you think the discriminatory outcome could have resulted from?
caj23a073 caj23a Please select the correct answer.
caj23a074 caj23a You have indicated that [that the report did not specify / you do not recall] how the algorithm was developed. If you were asked to guess, which of the following options would be more likely?
caj23a075 caj23a Were you already familiar with the use of algorithms by public bodies prior to this survey?
caj23a076 caj23a Were you already familiar with the use of algorithms to detect welfare fraud by municipalities in the Netherlands prior to this survey?
caj23a077 caj23a Were you already familiar with the use of algorithms by the police in the Netherlands prior to this survey?
caj23a078 caj23a According to the Centraal Planbureau (CPB), in 2022 the average gross income for a person working in the Netherlands is 38.500 euros annually (or 3.208 euros gross per month). Is your income:
caj23a079 caj23a In politics, people sometimes talk of “left” and “right”. Where would you place yourself on this scale ranging from 1 (left) to 7 (right).
caj23a080 caj23a Do you work or have you worked in the civil service?
caj23a081 caj23a Do you work or have you worked in municipal administration?
caj23a082 caj23a Do you work or have you worked at the police?
caj23a083 caj23a Is there anything else you would like to share with us?
caj23a084 caj23a Was it difficult to answer the questions?
caj23a085 caj23a Were the questions sufficiently clear?
caj23a086 caj23a Did the questionnaire get you thinking about things?
caj23a087 caj23a Was it an interesting subject?
caj23a088 caj23a Did you enjoy answering the questions?
caj23a089 caj23a Starting date questionnaire
caj23a090 caj23a Starting time questionnaire
caj23a091 caj23a End date questionnaire
caj23a092 caj23a End time questionnaire
caj23a093 caj23a Duration in seconds