Creator: Van De Vijver, F.J.R.
| Title | Description |
|---|---|
| LISS Data Archive > Threatening Identities: Interaction and Conflict in the Multicultural Netherlands | In January 2009, the LISS panel was presented a questionnaire about multi-cultural society in the Netherlands. Non-native panel members were presented questions about their own population group, while native Dutch respondents were assigned to groups at random. Depending on the group to which they were assigned, they were presented questions about one of the non-native population groups (Antilleans, Indonesians, Moroccans, Surinamese or Turks). |
| LISS panel > Culture and Society | In August 2009, the LISS panel was presented the questionnaire on Culture and Society. The questionnaire was presented to four different groups, namely 1) non-western immigrants of non-Turkish background, 2) first and second generation Turkish immigrants, 3) a control group consisting of native Dutch, and 4) a control group consisting of native Dutch and western immigrants. The way in which questions were presented in the questionnaire was subject to experimentation. Within a cluster of questions, part of the respondents was offered the opportunity to explain the answer they gave to a multiple-choice question. A second experiment involved the presentation of the questionnaire in a different layout. The questionnaire was unchanged in terms of content. |
| Immigrant panel > Multiculturalism | In August 2010, a questionnaire on multiculturalism was administered to the Immigrant panel to gain insight into the acculturation strategies of immigrants in the Netherlands. |
| Immigrant panel > Operant Motive Test | In September and October 2010, a questionnaire was administered to the Immigrant panel in which respondents were asked to answer three questions about six pictures (from 12 pictures in total). In September, it was randomly determined whether the respondent received picture 1 - 6 or picture 7 – 12. In October the respondent received the other six pictures. If a panelmember did not participate in September the order of the pictures was randomly determined in October (1 - 6 or 7 - 12). |
| Immigrant panel > Action Control Scale (ACS-90) | In June 2010, the LISS-I panel completed the Action Control Scale (ACS-90) questionnaire with the aim of gaining insight into the effects of independent versus interdependent self-construal on the relationship between self-regulatory competence, self-access and well-being across cultures. The two (of the three) scales used here are: a) Failure-related action orientation vs. preoccupation (AOF) b) Decision-related action orientation vs. hesitation (AOD). |
| Immigrant panel > Values Questionnaire | In April 2011, the Immigrants panel was presented a questionnaire on values. The values were measured by giving brief descriptions of persons and asking to what extent that person resembles the respondent. It applies to all descriptions in the questionnaire that, wherever reference is made to he/him/his, this can also be read as she/her/her. |
| Immigrant panel > Relationship satisfaction and attitudes | In July 2011, the Immigrant panel completed a questionnaire on the happiness with their relationship. The survey aims to gain insight into the level of satisfaction of immigrants in the Netherlands with their relationship and their attitudes towards relationships in general. |
| Immigrant panel > The function of autobiographical memory | The study is about how and in purpose of what people look back on certain events in their lives. |
| Immigrant panel > Retrospective Childhood | This questionnaire concerns retrospective childhood. |
| Immigrant panel > Volunteering | In December 2011, the Immigrant panel was presented the questionnaire regarding volunteering with the aim of gaining insight into the effect of thinking about volunteering on the willingness to engage in all kinds of situations. Respondents were randomly assigned to one of three conditions. In condition 1 respondents were asked to think about a situation in which they had helped another person. In condition 2 respondents were asked to remember a situation in which they had thought or talked about volunteers and their various reasons to do voluntary work. In condition 3 respondents were asked to remember one of their typical days. Respondents described these situations and were asked a few questions about the described situation. At the end of the questionnaire respondents were presented with all sorts of statements about (helping) behavior. They were asked to indicate to what extent they would be willing to engage in that behavior. |
| Emotional Expressiveness | The study is about differences and similarities between Dutch culture and cultures of immigrant groups in the Netherlands. |
| Emotional Expressiveness > Part 1 | In January 2012, the Immigrant panel was presented a questionnaire about how people deal with their emotions during conversations with familiar and unfamiliar people. |
| Emotional Expressiveness > Part 2 | In February 2012, the Immigrant panel completed a questionnaire about the differences and similarities between Dutch culture and the cultures of immigrant groups in the Netherlands. |
| Immigrant panel > Social-Relational Cluster (Personality) | This questionnaire is about interests, preferences, thoughts and behaviors in daily life. The questionnaire consisted of 10 scales that measured aspects of social-relational functioning; 5 scales were on positive social-relational behaviors and 5 on negative social-relational behaviors. Each scale consisted of 6 statements of which respondents indicated to what extent they agreed with them (1 totally disagree, 2 disagree, 3 slightly agree, slightly disagree, 4 agree, 5 totally agree). All scales were unipolar; the statements were formulated in the same direction. The 60 statements are not disseminated. Instead, the codebooks describe the 10 constructs that were measured. The data file consists only of scale scores. |
| Immigrant panel > Relationship Diary | Each day for 28 days, panel members filled out diaries about the experiences with their partner that day. The month prior to the survey, a filter question was presented to determine who met the criteria and were willing to participate. A few days prior to the survey, a letter with more detailed information was sent to the selected panel members. The diary took about 5 minutes to complete and panel members could earn up to 7 euros bonus. |
| Immigrant panel > Relationship Context Scale | In July 2012, the Immigrant panel was presented a questionnaire about family relationships during childhood. The questionnaire started with a filter question in order to determine whether panel members grew up with both their biological parents or not. If panel members grew up in a different, special, situation the question texts were formulated a bit different and the option “not applicable” was added. |
| Immigrant panel > Mini-K Short Form | In July 2012, the Immigrant panel was presented the Mini-K Short Form. The Mini-K Short Form is a component of the Arizona Life History Battery (ALHB), which is a battery of cognitive and behavioral indicators of life history strategy. Panel members were presented twenty statements and indicated to what extent they agreed or disagreed with these. |
| Immigrant panel > Helping Behavior | In January 2013, the questionnaire on helping behavior was fielded in the LISS-Immigrants panel. The questionnaire aims to examine different forms of helping behavior. |
| Immigrant panel > The Association between Relational Orientation, Personality, Culture and Life Satisfaction in the Netherlands | This study aims to explore how relational orientation relates to personality domains and life satisfaction in the multicultural Dutch context. In February 2013, the Immigrant panel was presented a questionnaire on relational orientation. Part 1 of the questionnaire consists of open questions. Due to the privacy issues of the data these open answers were not included in the dataset and are only available upon request. |